diff --git a/doc/Roadmap.md b/doc/Roadmap.md
index 757e8478..5fac7121 100644
--- a/doc/Roadmap.md
+++ b/doc/Roadmap.md
@@ -87,8 +87,33 @@ MODULE Files.
 
 I see this as another argument in favour of locking LONGINT down as 32 bits.
 
+#### It's all the same to C
 
+It should be possible to make the 32/64 bit compilation a compiler option
+available whether the compiler binary itself was built with 32 or 64 bit C.
 
+Indeed - is there any benefit in a 64 bit compiler binary? A 32 bit compiler
+binary will be smaller and faster. The memory requirements of the compiler are
+orders of magnitude less than those that would need a 64 bit implementation.
+
+The only need for a 64 bit compiler binary is for systems that can only run
+64 bit binaries.
+
+Point being - the bit size of the compiler binary should be independent of the
+bit size of the target machine of the C code being generated.
+
+So the compiler options could be:
+
+ 1. Generated binary bit size - 32 or 64 bit. Determines bit size of
+    SYSTEM.ADDRESS. Add 16 bit option for controllers.
+ 2. Size of INTEGER, SET and LONGINT. Defaulting to 16,32,32 the parameter would
+    also allow 32/64/64.
+
+The libraries would be written and compiled to handle all cases. e.g.
+  - A WriteInt routine needs it's value parameter to accept integers of all
+    sizes and would be coded as LONG64.   
+  - ReadInt is slightly more difficult because the parameter is VAR. Make the
+    parameter ARRAY OF BYTE and process according to SIZE(param).
 
 #### A feature I'd really like to see
 
@@ -100,6 +125,14 @@ least by 1975. This could be achieved by including a table of .Mod file line
 number vs code address, and having the runtime seach this table for the failure
 address. It would be quite a lot of work!
 
+The current position tracking code in the compiler is buggy - for example the
+position at the end of the `expr` in `WHILE expr DO stmt END` is recorded as
+the position of the END when it should be of the 'DO'. This makes compiler error
+reporting a bit unhelpful, but it's worse for runtime error reporting as we end
+up with duplicate entries in the line number table. The position handling code
+is somewhat obscure as it uses a convenient but misnamed spare integer field in
+the symbol record and it's difficult to follow just when it patches it.
+
 #### Oberon 07/15 mode
 
  - Add standard BYTE type being an unsigned integer between 0 and 255.
@@ -109,6 +142,8 @@ address. It would be quite a lot of work!
  - Reject LOOP statements.
  - All imported variables are read-only.
 
+See [Difference between Oberon-07 and Oberon](https://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/wirth/Oberon/Oberon07.pdf).
+
 #### To be left out?
 
 Work on other compatibility layers is in progress.
diff --git a/src/tools/make/buildall.pl b/src/tools/make/buildall.pl
index ed290b81..20031295 100755
--- a/src/tools/make/buildall.pl
+++ b/src/tools/make/buildall.pl
@@ -7,13 +7,14 @@ use Cwd;
 my $branch = "master";
 
 my %machines = (
-  "pi"     => ['pi@pie',         "sudo", "projects/oberon/vishap/voc"],
-  "darwin" => ['dave@dcb',       "sudo", "projects/oberon/vishap/voc"],
-  "lub32"  => ['dave@lub32',     "sudo", "vishap/voc"],
-  "ob32"   => ['root@nas-ob32',  "",     "vishap/voc"],
-  "ce64"   => ['-p5922 obe@www', "sudo", "vishap/voc"],
-  "ub64"   => ['dave@nas-ub64',  "sudo", "vishap/voc"],
-  "fb64"   => ['root@oberon',    "",     "vishap/voc"]
+  "pi"     => ['pi@pie',          "sudo", "make full", "projects/oberon/vishap/voc"],
+  "darwin" => ['dave@dcb',        "sudo", "make full", "projects/oberon/vishap/voc"],
+  "wind"   => ['-p5932 dave@wax', "",     "make full", "vishaps/voc"],
+  "lub32"  => ['dave@lub32',      "sudo", "make full", "vishap/voc"],
+  "ob32"   => ['root@nas-ob32',   "",     "make full", "vishap/voc"],
+  "ce64"   => ['-p5922 obe@www',  "sudo", "make full", "vishap/voc"],
+  "ub64"   => ['dave@nas-ub64',   "sudo", "make full", "vishap/voc"],
+  "fb64"   => ['root@oberon',     "",     "make full", "vishap/voc"]
 );
 
 
@@ -45,8 +46,8 @@ sub logged {
 unlink glob "log/*";
 
 for my $machine (sort keys %machines) {
-  my ($login, $sudo, $dir) = @{$machines{$machine}};
-  my $cmd = "ssh $login \"cd $dir && $sudo git checkout $branch && $sudo git pull && $sudo make full\" ";
+  my ($login, $sudo, $mkcmd, $dir) = @{$machines{$machine}};
+  my $cmd = "ssh $login \"cd $dir && $sudo git checkout $branch && $sudo git pull && $sudo $mkcmd\" ";
   logged($cmd, $machine);
 }